Thursday, May 7, 2015

HORRIFYING TALE OF HIT AND RUN CASE:


As an ordinary citizen I wish to get answer of the following:
1.Is drinking constitutional? If yes why driving is prohibited for a drunk driver? Can an individual protect the sanctity of her under arm and at the same time allowed to use thrashing tool to thrust the raw rice?
2.It is lawful for one to walk the right lanes &cross the road carefully but is it constitutional to sleep on either sides of roads and avoiding to use the available railway stations for slumber? If compulsion or poverty be the reasons for one to leave his birth place ,half of the population of some Indian states will have been deserted.?
3,It is observed that the left tire of the vehicle had severe burst and also the frontal left portion  of the vehicle involved had the worst inflicted accident impact? Has the judge discussed this also to draw conclusion that it was will full planned murder by the chopper or accidental event?
4.Bolly wood fraternity was not wrong by forging unity among them.  They are also inspired by other section of Indian society under such situation. Whether they  are right or wrong, the case is decided by a judge not by a lobby of  Bolly wood.

5.Let us admit parallel courts are run by the community of TV Channels, political parties    dominated by their whims and fancies.

No comments:

Post a Comment