The political parties jumped in to this controversy in the
name of constitutionality (Fundamental Right; Equality before Law) .A section
of women (Not many) directly affected by this arrangement and NGO s working in
their favor have not based their data on wide-ranging studies .For example,it is not known how
long their(victims) marriages did work
between the couples prior to this triple shots in quick succession ? It was
also not made clear what were actually the deep rooted causes of their separation
in each case? Whether efforts towards reconciliation were carried out?
Anti triple talaq hype was debated very roughly in channels and
were largely biased .It was orchestrated
to tell the society that it was happening on a large scale in Muslim India .
Issue being a problem between two human beings, only the male has been held responsible.
Suddenly constitution and fundamental rights were brought to fore .If marrying
is fundamental right why is it that millions of women attaining marriageable
age are finding themselves without husbands .If it is a treaty between two couples
,its dissolution(termination )is within its ambit. I will say sword of dam loc (divorce)is always hanging over their heads more so who happen to be
headless .The working relation on the definition of their independent
commentary about marriage and its understanding
must be looked in to that life is not bed of roses. Equal rights and duties
between wife and husband cannot be mathematically weighed and traded .The two
are not a commodity but are now made pawn in the hands of third parties ; so
called social reformist and political parties.
One of them follow the life management starting from material goals , material
satisfaction, social responsibility guided by the world around them and its
ends in non spiritual walk .The doctrine followed practice and suggested by ALL INDIA PERSONAL
BOARD has its origin from the root
of spiritualism wading through
the materialist route and leading finally to spiritual discourse . The two groups are fighting on
different notes and canvas. The clash is apparent.
The anti Triple talaq lobby consists of those women and men
who are using the doctrine of Holy Quran which they neither know nor practice
least .#Mariya Salim Advocate ,#Smt Chandra
Rajan Advocate and Zakia Saheba were forcefully
advocating the implementation of injunctions in this respect found in The Holy scripts . So was the case
of #Faizur Rahman Activits. All were invited by #NDTV 24X7 anchored by #Vikram
.The three women must have known that head covering is prescribed for gentle
women in Islam and Coverage of bosom with
the same head covering is enjoined but
none of them could be found practicing .Therefore their hypocrisy stands exposed
on scrutiny .They are not there for solution but dissolution of Muslim
fraternity .
No comments:
Post a Comment