Can Lord Ram be so helpless and luxury loving that he aspires
a palatial abode for him and has conveyed his displeasure to this journalist?
#NEWS 18 INDIA(Hindi Channel) in its late night debate on 6th
of December2017 ,the Day 1992,Babri
Mosque was demolished by the Karsevak trained and driven to the city of
Ayodhya to dismantle it to the ground in
presence of a powerful but now defunct communal
police force under the then chief
minister# Kallyan Singh of Uttar Pradesh, now #Governor of Rajshthan, the mosque built in the year 1556 claimed
later to be the birth place of Lord Ram .
The anchor kept on asking a questions from congress and
others ,how long Ram Lala will be there
in the 25 years old tent? A question coming from an anchor of the above channel
suggests his language of heart that soon he chose to become a party to the
dispute. His expressed concern about the 25 years old tent under which Ram Lala
was placed in his present abode in make and shift move during the demolition
drive ,certainly disqualifies him to be a journalist.
(1)Knowing very well that the case now has started in the
three judge supreme court with effect from 5th of December to decide the possession
title of the disputed sight. How could he foresee the judgment in favor of removal
/replacement of the said tent which has made Ram Lala unsafe and unsuitable for
him?
(2)Is Lord Ram be so
helpless and luxry loving that he aspires a palatial abode for him and has
conveyed his displeasure to this journalist?
(3)Who is responsible for the agony which Lord Ram is suffering
on account of the ugly and sub standard treatment in the rotten tent? Will he
dare asking the #RSS,#BJP and Shour Bansees(# VHP)for this insult?
(3) I recommend the anchor to give up the present job and join Barang dal or VHP to
be more useful for this campaign.
No comments:
Post a Comment